Fannie Mae’s exploration of crypto-backed mortgage concepts is drawing attention across both housing and financial markets, highlighting how emerging asset classes could intersect with traditional mortgage lending. While still in early-stage discussion, the idea reflects a broader push to modernize underwriting approaches and expand the range of assets that may be considered in qualifying borrowers.
Fannie Mae has returned to the spotlight among investors as questions surrounding its future structure, regulatory status, and potential reform continue to shape market sentiment. While the government-sponsored enterprise remains a central pillar of the U.S. housing finance system, uncertainty about its long-term trajectory is influencing how investors evaluate its stock and broader role in mortgage markets.
Mortgage rates moved sharply higher after geopolitical tensions intensified following military strikes involving Iran, reversing the modest decline borrowers had seen only days earlier. The sudden change illustrates how quickly global events can ripple through financial markets and ultimately influence borrowing costs for American homebuyers.
Fannie Mae is enhancing the transparency of its mortgage-backed securities by expanding the scope and accessibility of loan-level disclosure data, a move aimed at improving investor insight and strengthening confidence in agency MBS markets. The update reflects ongoing efforts to modernize capital markets reporting standards and respond to investor demand for more granular performance information.
A senior Federal Reserve official has indicated that the central bank may consider adjustments to certain mortgage lending rules, adding a new layer to the ongoing conversation about regulatory reform and credit access. The remarks suggest that policymakers are evaluating whether existing standards remain appropriately calibrated in today’s housing and economic environment.
Following another profitable quarter and strong results for 2016, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac seem like their strong enough to survive on their own without government conservatorship. But despite their healthy financials, the future is both organizations is...
Opinion-Editorial (Op-Ed) Disclaimer For NAMU® Library Articles: The views and opinions expressed in the NAMU® Library articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect any official NAMU® policy or position. Examples of analysis performed within this article are only examples. They should not be utilized in real-world application as they are based only on very limited and dated open source information. Assumptions made within the analysis are not reflective of the position of NAMU®. Nothing contained in this articles should be considered legal advice.
President Donald Trump had barely settled into the Oval Office when he reversed an Obama Administration cut on FHA mortgage insurance premiums. A week before leaving office, President Obama announced a cut in...
Opinion-Editorial (Op-Ed) Disclaimer For NAMU® Library Articles: The views and opinions expressed in the NAMU® Library articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect any official NAMU® policy or position. Examples of analysis performed within this article are only examples. They should not be utilized in real-world application as they are based only on very limited and dated open source information. Assumptions made within the analysis are not reflective of the position of NAMU®. Nothing contained in this articles should be considered legal advice.
The job market for professionals in the mortgage industry is expected to grow modestly in both the short-term and long-term...
Opinion-Editorial (Op-Ed) Disclaimer For NAMU® Library Articles: The views and opinions expressed in the NAMU® Library articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect any official NAMU® policy or position. Examples of analysis performed within this article are only examples. They should not be utilized in real-world application as they are based only on very limited and dated open source information. Assumptions made within the analysis are not reflective of the position of NAMU®. Nothing contained in this articles should be considered legal advice.
Professionals entering the field of mortgage underwriting can expect a starting salary of around $50,000 a year while those with a decade or more of experience can sometimes command six figures, according to multiple survey reports found on online job and career websites...
Opinion-Editorial (Op-Ed) Disclaimer For NAMU® Library Articles: The views and opinions expressed in the NAMU® Library articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect any official NAMU® policy or position. Examples of analysis performed within this article are only examples. They should not be utilized in real-world application as they are based only on very limited and dated open source information. Assumptions made within the analysis are not reflective of the position of NAMU®. Nothing contained in this articles should be considered legal advice.
After years of suppressing interest rates as low as possible, the Federal Reserve has increased the federal funds rate by 50 basis points over two rate increases in the last year. The Fed also projects three rates increases annually for the next three years...
Opinion-Editorial (Op-Ed) Disclaimer For NAMU® Library Articles: The views and opinions expressed in the NAMU® Library articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect any official NAMU® policy or position. Examples of analysis performed within this article are only examples. They should not be utilized in real-world application as they are based only on very limited and dated open source information. Assumptions made within the analysis are not reflective of the position of NAMU®. Nothing contained in this articles should be considered legal advice.
What impact will President Donald Trump have on mortgage processors and underwriters over the next four years or more? The answers may be as unpredictable as his campaign and as surprising as his victory on Election Day...
Opinion-Editorial (Op-Ed) Disclaimer For NAMU® Library Articles: The views and opinions expressed in the NAMU® Library articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect any official NAMU® policy or position. Examples of analysis performed within this article are only examples. They should not be utilized in real-world application as they are based only on very limited and dated open source information. Assumptions made within the analysis are not reflective of the position of NAMU®. Nothing contained in this articles should be considered legal advice.
There are certain situations where the borrower must show that they have reserves after closing. Individuals purchasing or refinancing three and/or four family homes with FHA financing must provide evidence that they will have three (3) months of PITI reserves. The reserve does not include funds received from a gift. The reserves must be the borrower’s own money.
Opinion-Editorial (Op-Ed) Disclaimer For NAMU® Library Articles: The views and opinions expressed in the NAMU® Library articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect any official NAMU® policy or position. Examples of analysis performed within this article are only examples. They should not be utilized in real-world application as they are based only on very limited and dated open source information. Assumptions made within the analysis are not reflective of the position of NAMU®. Nothing contained in this articles should be considered legal advice.
In cases where borrowers are unable to qualify due to unacceptable credit, lenders may provide credit repair coaching as a customer service benefit.Providing this service will allow the consumer to reapply at a later date with more success. Prior to issuing an adverse action, explore all options for approval. This will allow you to provide detailed information to the borrower regarding areas where their credit application can be improved.
Opinion-Editorial (Op-Ed) Disclaimer For NAMU® Library Articles: The views and opinions expressed in the NAMU® Library articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect any official NAMU® policy or position. Examples of analysis performed within this article are only examples. They should not be utilized in real-world application as they are based only on very limited and dated open source information. Assumptions made within the analysis are not reflective of the position of NAMU®. Nothing contained in this articles should be considered legal advice.
In December 2014, Fannie Mae issued a selling guide update regarding the required methods for analyzing self-employed borrowers whose income is reported on Schedule K-1 for S-corporations or Partnerships. In August 2015, Fannie Mae issued a selling guide update that delayed the implementation of these new rules until February 2016. On June 28, 2016 Fannie Mae issued another update which clarified some of the policies outlined in the original selling guide update from 2014. As a result, it is now mandatory that all lenders begin to analyze self-employed income utilizing these new rules.
Opinion-Editorial (Op-Ed) Disclaimer For NAMU® Library Articles: The views and opinions expressed in the NAMU® Library articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect any official NAMU® policy or position. Examples of analysis performed within this article are only examples. They should not be utilized in real-world application as they are based only on very limited and dated open source information. Assumptions made within the analysis are not reflective of the position of NAMU®. Nothing contained in this articles should be considered legal advice.
Periodically the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) and other organizations keep tract of the housing industry. When the numbers are up that is usually an indication that the mortgage industry will increase or decline.
Opinion-Editorial (Op-Ed) Disclaimer For NAMU® Library Articles: The views and opinions expressed in the NAMU® Library articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect any official NAMU® policy or position. Examples of analysis performed within this article are only examples. They should not be utilized in real-world application as they are based only on very limited and dated open source information. Assumptions made within the analysis are not reflective of the position of NAMU®. Nothing contained in this articles should be considered legal advice.
Written By: Stacey Sprain
As an FHA originator, processor or underwriter, it’s likely that in the ongoing foreclosure market you’ll run across a HUD REO loan at some point. The purpose of this multi-part article is to provide you with some useful information to help in your endeavors.