Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac produced profitable third quarter financial results consistent with recent trends. The government-sponsored enterprises released third-quarter results last week, with Fannie Mae reporting a $4 billion quarterly profit and Freddie Mac reporting $3.1 billion in net income.
Home sales are on the decline despite lower mortgage rates and increasing supply, with the latest projections indicating a 30-year low for this year. Real estate brokerage Redfin reported that existing home sales fell 3.1 percent year over year in August to their lowest mark since May 2020, when the pandemic brought the housing market to a standstill. Removing that month, August sales were the lowest since 2012.
Several reports released in the past week may give mortgage underwriters and processors a reason to feel more optimistic about the possibility of more potential borrowers in the near future. The bottom line in recent data is that buying a home is slowly becoming more affordable due to a combination of lower mortgage rates and slower growth in home values.
The Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) issued housing goals for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac over the next three years. The proposed rule would establish the following benchmark levels that Fannie and Freddie would be required to meet annually between 2025 and 2027:
An increase in tappable home equity and falling mortgage rates has many industry analysts optimistic about the potential refinance market. However, others caution that consumers are becoming more cautious about taking on more debt due to escalating costs of home ownership. Technology and data provider Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) Inc. reported in its latest ICE Mortgage Monitor Report that tappable home equity reached a new high of $11.5 trillion in June, more than 9 percent above the same period a year ago.
As we all dealt with back in March, the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) is set to expire yet again at midnight on May 31st. With a holiday weekend looming, it’s somewhat doubtful congress will have this resolved by the forthcoming expiration date.
Opinion-Editorial (Op-Ed) Disclaimer For NAMU® Library Articles: The views and opinions expressed in the NAMU® Library articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect any official NAMU® policy or position. Examples of analysis performed within this article are only examples. They should not be utilized in real-world application as they are based only on very limited and dated open source information. Assumptions made within the analysis are not reflective of the position of NAMU®. Nothing contained in this articles should be considered legal advice.
On May 11th, USDA announced that they would continue to issue Conditional Commitments for Guaranteed Rural Housing loans until even after 2010 appropriated funds has been exhausted. Their bulletin stated that such Conditional Commitments would be issued with a condition stating “subject to the availability of funds and Congressional authority to charge a 3.5 percent guarantee fee for purchase loans and a 2.25 percent guarantee fee for refinance loans.”
Opinion-Editorial (Op-Ed) Disclaimer For NAMU® Library Articles: The views and opinions expressed in the NAMU® Library articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect any official NAMU® policy or position. Examples of analysis performed within this article are only examples. They should not be utilized in real-world application as they are based only on very limited and dated open source information. Assumptions made within the analysis are not reflective of the position of NAMU®. Nothing contained in this articles should be considered legal advice.
Just when we think we have a handle on documentation requirements where mortgage underwriting is concerned, they go and change the rules and further complicate our lives. The past year has found us embracing due diligence in underwriting with all of the gusto we could muster, seriously limiting the use of documentation waivers provided by AUS as well as embracing all of the old school methodology of underwriting and still, beginning June 1, 2010 we will scrutinize our borrowers further.
Opinion-Editorial (Op-Ed) Disclaimer For NAMU® Library Articles: The views and opinions expressed in the NAMU® Library articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect any official NAMU® policy or position. Examples of analysis performed within this article are only examples. They should not be utilized in real-world application as they are based only on very limited and dated open source information. Assumptions made within the analysis are not reflective of the position of NAMU®. Nothing contained in this articles should be considered legal advice.
In my many years of underwriting, there are always interesting things that require research, further clarification, getting feedback from third party sources or getting “official” answers from the senior level credit policy folks. Today’s blog deals with some of my experiences over the years and what/how I solved situations that needed to be resolved prior to being able to approve a loan.
Opinion-Editorial (Op-Ed) Disclaimer For NAMU® Library Articles: The views and opinions expressed in the NAMU® Library articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect any official NAMU® policy or position. Examples of analysis performed within this article are only examples. They should not be utilized in real-world application as they are based only on very limited and dated open source information. Assumptions made within the analysis are not reflective of the position of NAMU®. Nothing contained in this articles should be considered legal advice.
Lately the news has been filled with images of flood-ravaged areas like Nashville and Kentucky, of tornado damage and destruction in the central plains, and of other natural disaster areas throughout the U.S. Therefore, I thought it appropriate to start coverage on Disaster Policies for the agencies.
Opinion-Editorial (Op-Ed) Disclaimer For NAMU® Library Articles: The views and opinions expressed in the NAMU® Library articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect any official NAMU® policy or position. Examples of analysis performed within this article are only examples. They should not be utilized in real-world application as they are based only on very limited and dated open source information. Assumptions made within the analysis are not reflective of the position of NAMU®. Nothing contained in this articles should be considered legal advice.
I have had several conversations’ regarding this subject matter and that again being the submission of the perfect test case to HUD. Quite frankly, the mortgage industry as a whole really believes that the only cases that are to be submitted to HUD for test case purposes are perfect, plain vanilla files that require little if any underwriting ability to assess except of course for the one mortgage credit reject that they will consider and this is far from accurate.
Opinion-Editorial (Op-Ed) Disclaimer For NAMU® Library Articles: The views and opinions expressed in the NAMU® Library articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect any official NAMU® policy or position. Examples of analysis performed within this article are only examples. They should not be utilized in real-world application as they are based only on very limited and dated open source information. Assumptions made within the analysis are not reflective of the position of NAMU®. Nothing contained in this articles should be considered legal advice.
For the first time since 1993, HUD has announced that it’s upping net worth requirements for FHA-approved Mortgagees as part of the risk management initiative; a move to assure that Mortgagees have sufficient capital to withstand today’s market risks.
Opinion-Editorial (Op-Ed) Disclaimer For NAMU® Library Articles: The views and opinions expressed in the NAMU® Library articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect any official NAMU® policy or position. Examples of analysis performed within this article are only examples. They should not be utilized in real-world application as they are based only on very limited and dated open source information. Assumptions made within the analysis are not reflective of the position of NAMU®. Nothing contained in this articles should be considered legal advice.
The recent blogs I have been writing have been written based on actual things happening on my job as an underwriter for one of the top lenders here on the East Coast (where I live). Nothing really larger than life has been happening this week at the office, so I decided to write about one of my pet peeves on underwriting loans in these most unusual times in our business….so, my dilemma this week is………………….
Opinion-Editorial (Op-Ed) Disclaimer For NAMU® Library Articles: The views and opinions expressed in the NAMU® Library articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect any official NAMU® policy or position. Examples of analysis performed within this article are only examples. They should not be utilized in real-world application as they are based only on very limited and dated open source information. Assumptions made within the analysis are not reflective of the position of NAMU®. Nothing contained in this articles should be considered legal advice.
Written By: Stacey Sprain
As an FHA originator, processor or underwriter, it’s likely that in the ongoing foreclosure market you’ll run across a HUD REO loan at some point. The purpose of this multi-part article is to provide you with some useful information to help in your endeavors.